If you wish to contact me privately, my email is primemover333@gmail.com. If you wish to know how I got three columns across the top of my blog but only two below ... if you're willing to pay, I'm willing to tell you (unless I really like you, then you don't have to pay).

I enjoy discussion both with people that agree with me and those that don't, so comment liberally if you so choose. However, don't expect me to pull punches if your comments are nonsense.

I believe I will be focusing, for the greater part, on the practical side of things. In other words, "less art, more substance;" how I apply Objectivism in my everyday life. There are enough blogs and other resources available that talk theory. I've provided links to a number of them here. For now, I prefer to focus on applying that theory to the nitty-gritty of everyday life instead of higher concepts. However, inevitably, there will probably by some conceptual posts as well; like any time something really gets my goat. Enjoy.

Wednesday, September 24, 2008

Paul + Baldwin = No More Support from Me

It's a simple calculation. Ron Paul has decided to add his support to Chuck Baldwin; therefore, I have decided to subtract my support from Ron Paul (ouch, feel the sting Paulie?). Baldwin and his Constitution Party hold the view that this country was founded on, and should move more overtly toward a Christian ethic based government. They state specifically in their party platform that "Education as a whole, therefore, cannot be separated from religious faith." To me, this is untenable and unacceptable. If it were true, we would still be teaching our children that the sun revolves around the Earth. They say they affirm the 1st Amendment, and in the next breath want to ban pornography. Baldwin himself has been quoted as blaming 9/11 on a wrathful god three days after the attack. "For nearly a half-century, we have forsaken the moral principles of Heaven. We have legally murdered too many unborn babies. We have too readily accepted aberrant, sexual behavior. We kicked Heaven out of our schools, out of our homes, and out of our hearts. As a result, God is giving us a little taste of Hell." With this view, how would he shape his foreign policy, with a Magic 8 Ball?

~Adam

[edit 10/29] I re-read the above post an realised I never mentioned what my conclusions about Paul were. The reason I was attracted to him in the first place was I believed he was a man on principle. His consistent voting record, his speeches on the market, his solid stance on eliminating government departments all led me to this conclusion. However, with the press conference he called inviting all manner of statists and (as mentioned above) his endorsement of Baldwin I now see that he is just another big L Libertarian that has trouble telling the difference between principles and disgruntlement with the current system.

Thursday, September 18, 2008

Household Supply and Demand

When it comes to politics, economics and such, my wife and I don't agree on much. I, as you may have guessed by now, am an Objectivist, and she is a non-religious Buddhist. What being a non-religious Buddhist means exactly I'm not sure. Jes is a fairly rational girl, however, in my opinion, she doesn't speak up for what she wants as much as she should.

Example: last night we were bathing Evan and she asked me whether I would rather wash his hair or his body. So, I washed his hair ... as I have for most of the other baths. Jes wanted to wash his hair instead of his body too, but, for some reason, decided to give me the option. In this case, she learned her lesson quickly and instead of giving me the option, just asked me to dry him off while she disposed of the bath water (usually those roles are reversed).

Similarly, I've noticed a change in the division of household chores. In this case, the change has been an automatic response to a different dynamic in our home. Traditionally, Jes has done the vast majority of the day-to-day chores (cleaning, cooking, dishes, etc.). This has dismayed Jessica at times, but she takes solace in her grandmother's axiom that "marriage is never a 50/50 proposition." However, as her duties pertaining to Evan have increased more than mine have, I have stepped in to fill the ensuing gap. This by itself is not significant, nor am I looking for applause; as I will detail in a moment, I did it, automatically, out of my own self-interest.

Jes has been asking me since ... well, since we first moved in together to do more around the house. For the most part, her solicitations have fallen upon deaf ears. Growing up, I didn't do much in the way of chores. The prevailing parental opinion was that my job was going to school. This dismayed my mother at times. No matter the amount of nagging (not much really) from my mother, I was not budged to contribute, altruistically, to maintain a higher level of cleanliness and peace at home than I desired (especially with no ownership share in the house). As a sidebar, I didn't become an Objectivist until years after I had left home, but these thoughts were still floating around, unformed, in my head.

Now, in a free market-like response, I am contributing more without having to be asked, yelled at, or begged and without it having to be legislated in some kind of household chore list because I want the house to be maintained in a certain fashion. When Jes was maintaining that fashion at no mental, emotional, or financial cost to me what was my motivation to do more? Now, the supply of labour for chores has decreased while the my demand for a level of cleanliness and peace at home has remained constant. Consequently, I have stepped it up.

It took me almost three months to realise I was doing more.

~Adam